lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be825436-c310-4565-b902-13b1be930647@moroto.mountain>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:26:03 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal/cpufreq: increment i in
 cpufreq_get_requested_power()

On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:41:52AM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Would you agree that I will keep you as 'Reported-by' and send a
> separate patch to change that !SMP code completely in that
> get_load() function and get rid of the 'cpu_idx' argument?

Yes, please.

regards,
dan carpenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ