[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240506121906.76639-4-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 17:49:00 +0530
From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
irogers@...gle.com, namhyung@...nel.org, segher@...nel.crashing.org,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com, atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akanksha@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/9] tools/perf: Fix a comment about multi_regs in extract_reg_offset function
Fix a comment in function which explains how multi_regs field gets set
for an instruction. In the example, "mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4)", the
comment mistakenly referred to "dst_multi_regs = 0". Correct it to use
"src_multi_regs = 0"
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index f5b6b5e5e757..0f5e10654d09 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -2093,7 +2093,7 @@ static int extract_reg_offset(struct arch *arch, const char *str,
* mov 0x18, %r8 # src_reg1 = -1, src_mem = 0
* # dst_reg1 = r8, dst_mem = 0
*
- * mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4) # src_reg1 = rsi, src_mem = 0, dst_multi_regs = 0
+ * mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4) # src_reg1 = rsi, src_mem = 0, src_multi_regs = 0
* # dst_reg1 = rbx, dst_reg2 = rcx, dst_mem = 1
* # dst_multi_regs = 1, dst_offset = 8
*/
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists