| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H5wNmgxGincGE7cJ8WvrpKFauAJvMHrPttW-LrKB4UeHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 22:17:51 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: maobibo <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add vcpu search support from
physical cpuid
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 6:05 PM maobibo <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024/5/6 下午5:40, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 5:35 PM maobibo <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2024/5/6 下午4:59, Huacai Chen wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 4:18 PM maobibo <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024/5/6 下午3:06, Huacai Chen wrote:
> >>>>> Hi, Bibo,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:36 PM maobibo <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024/5/6 上午9:49, Huacai Chen wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi, Bibo,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 6:05 PM Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Physical cpuid is used for interrupt routing for irqchips such as
> >>>>>>>> ipi/msi/extioi interrupt controller. And physical cpuid is stored
> >>>>>>>> at CSR register LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID, it can not be changed once vcpu
> >>>>>>>> is created and physical cpuid of two vcpus cannot be the same.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Different irqchips have different size declaration about physical cpuid,
> >>>>>>>> max cpuid value for CSR LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID on 3A5000 is 512, max cpuid
> >>>>>>>> supported by IPI hardware is 1024, 256 for extioi irqchip, and 65536
> >>>>>>>> for MSI irqchip.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The smallest value from all interrupt controllers is selected now,
> >>>>>>>> and the max cpuid size is defines as 256 by KVM which comes from
> >>>>>>>> extioi irqchip.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
> >>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 26 ++++++++
> >>>>>>>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h | 1 +
> >>>>>>>> arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>>>>> arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c | 11 ++++
> >>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>>>>>>> index 2d62f7b0d377..3ba16ef1fe69 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -64,6 +64,30 @@ struct kvm_world_switch {
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> #define MAX_PGTABLE_LEVELS 4
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>>> + * Physical cpu id is used for interrupt routing, there are different
> >>>>>>>> + * definitions about physical cpuid on different hardwares.
> >>>>>>>> + * For LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID register, max cpuid size if 512
> >>>>>>>> + * For IPI HW, max dest CPUID size 1024
> >>>>>>>> + * For extioi interrupt controller, max dest CPUID size is 256
> >>>>>>>> + * For MSI interrupt controller, max supported CPUID size is 65536
> >>>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>>> + * Currently max CPUID is defined as 256 for KVM hypervisor, in future
> >>>>>>>> + * it will be expanded to 4096, including 16 packages at most. And every
> >>>>>>>> + * package supports at most 256 vcpus
> >>>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>>> +#define KVM_MAX_PHYID 256
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +struct kvm_phyid_info {
> >>>>>>>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> >>>>>>>> + bool enabled;
> >>>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +struct kvm_phyid_map {
> >>>>>>>> + int max_phyid;
> >>>>>>>> + struct kvm_phyid_info phys_map[KVM_MAX_PHYID];
> >>>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> struct kvm_arch {
> >>>>>>>> /* Guest physical mm */
> >>>>>>>> kvm_pte_t *pgd;
> >>>>>>>> @@ -71,6 +95,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> >>>>>>>> unsigned long invalid_ptes[MAX_PGTABLE_LEVELS];
> >>>>>>>> unsigned int pte_shifts[MAX_PGTABLE_LEVELS];
> >>>>>>>> unsigned int root_level;
> >>>>>>>> + spinlock_t phyid_map_lock;
> >>>>>>>> + struct kvm_phyid_map *phyid_map;
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> s64 time_offset;
> >>>>>>>> struct kvm_context __percpu *vmcs;
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h
> >>>>>>>> index 0cb4fdb8a9b5..9f53950959da 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ void kvm_save_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >>>>>>>> void kvm_restore_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_interrupt *irq);
> >>>>>>>> +struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu_by_cpuid(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> /*
> >>>>>>>> * Loongarch KVM guest interrupt handling
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpuc
> >>>>>>>> index 3a8779065f73..b633fd28b8db 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
> >>>>>>>> @@ -274,6 +274,95 @@ static int _kvm_getcsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id, u64 *val)
> >>>>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +static inline int kvm_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>> + int cpuid;
> >>>>>>>> + struct loongarch_csrs *csr = vcpu->arch.csr;
> >>>>>>>> + struct kvm_phyid_map *map;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + if (val >= KVM_MAX_PHYID)
> >>>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + cpuid = kvm_read_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ESTAT);
> >>>>>>>> + map = vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map;
> >>>>>>>> + spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> >>>>>>>> + if (map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled) {
> >>>>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>>>> + * Cpuid is already set before
> >>>>>>>> + * Forbid changing different cpuid at runtime
> >>>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>>> + if (cpuid != val) {
> >>>>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>>>> + * Cpuid 0 is initial value for vcpu, maybe invalid
> >>>>>>>> + * unset value for vcpu
> >>>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>>> + if (cpuid) {
> >>>>>>>> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> >>>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>> + } else {
> >>>>>>>> + /* Discard duplicated cpuid set */
> >>>>>>>> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> >>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> I have changed the logic and comments when I apply, you can double
> >>>>>>> check whether it is correct.
> >>>>>> I checkout the latest version, the modification in function
> >>>>>> kvm_set_cpuid() is good for me.
> >>>>> Now the modified version is like this:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + if (map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled) {
> >>>>> + /* Discard duplicated CPUID set operation */
> >>>>> + if (cpuid == val) {
> >>>>> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> >>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /*
> >>>>> + * CPUID is already set before
> >>>>> + * Forbid changing different CPUID at runtime
> >>>>> + * But CPUID 0 is the initial value for vcpu, so allow
> >>>>> + * changing from 0 to others
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> + if (cpuid) {
> >>>>> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> >>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> But I still doubt whether we should allow changing from 0 to others
> >>>>> while map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled is 1.
> >>>> It is necessary since the default sw cpuid is zero :-( And we can
> >>>> optimize it in later, such as set INVALID cpuid in function
> >>>> kvm_arch_vcpu_create() and logic will be simple in function kvm_set_cpuid().
> >>> In my opinion, if a vcpu with a uninitialized default physid=0, then
> >>> map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled should be 0, then code won't come here.
> >>> And if a vcpu with a real physid=0, then map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled
> >>> is 1, but we shouldn't allow it to change physid in this case.
> >> yes, that is actually a problem.
> >>
> >> vcpu0 firstly set physid=0, and vcpu0 set physid=1 again is not allowed.
> >> vcpu0 firstly set physid=0, and vcpu1 set physid=1 is allowed.
> >
> > So can we simply drop the if (cpuid) checking? That means:
> > + if (map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled) {
> > + /* Discard duplicated CPUID set operation */
> > + if (cpuid == val) {
> > + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> yes, the similar modification such as following, since the secondary
> scenario should be allowed.
> "vcpu0 firstly set physid=0, and vcpu1 set physid=1 is allowed though
> default sw cpuid is zero"
>
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static inline int kvm_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu, u64 val)
> cpuid = kvm_read_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID);
>
> spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> - if (map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled) {
> + if ((cpuid != KVM_MAX_PHYID) && map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled) {
> /* Discard duplicated CPUID set operation */
> if (cpuid == val) {
> spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> @@ -282,13 +282,9 @@ static inline int kvm_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu, u64 val)
> /*
> * CPUID is already set before
> * Forbid changing different CPUID at runtime
> - * But CPUID 0 is the initial value for vcpu, so allow
> - * changing from 0 to others
> */
> - if (cpuid) {
> - spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if (map->phys_map[val].enabled) {
> @@ -1029,6 +1025,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> /* Set cpuid */
> kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_TMID, vcpu->vcpu_id);
> + kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID, KVM_MAX_PHYID);
>
> /* Start with no pending virtual guest interrupts */
> csr->csrs[LOONGARCH_CSR_GINTC] = 0;
Very nice, but I think kvm_drop_cpuid() should also set to KVM_MAX_PHYID.
Now I update my loongarch-kvm branch, you can test it again, and hope
it is in the perfect status.
Huacai
>
>
> >
> > Huacai
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Huacai
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Bibo Mao
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Huacai
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + if (map->phys_map[val].enabled) {
> >>>>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>>>> + * New cpuid is already set with other vcpu
> >>>>>>>> + * Forbid sharing the same cpuid between different vcpus
> >>>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>>> + if (map->phys_map[val].vcpu != vcpu) {
> >>>>>>>> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> >>>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + /* Discard duplicated cpuid set operation*/
> >>>>>>>> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> >>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID, val);
> >>>>>>>> + map->phys_map[val].enabled = true;
> >>>>>>>> + map->phys_map[val].vcpu = vcpu;
> >>>>>>>> + if (map->max_phyid < val)
> >>>>>>>> + map->max_phyid = val;
> >>>>>>>> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> >>>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu_by_cpuid(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid)
> >>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>> + struct kvm_phyid_map *map;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + if (cpuid >= KVM_MAX_PHYID)
> >>>>>>>> + return NULL;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + map = kvm->arch.phyid_map;
> >>>>>>>> + if (map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled)
> >>>>>>>> + return map->phys_map[cpuid].vcpu;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + return NULL;
> >>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +static inline void kvm_drop_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>> + int cpuid;
> >>>>>>>> + struct loongarch_csrs *csr = vcpu->arch.csr;
> >>>>>>>> + struct kvm_phyid_map *map;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + map = vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map;
> >>>>>>>> + cpuid = kvm_read_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ESTAT);
> >>>>>>>> + if (cpuid >= KVM_MAX_PHYID)
> >>>>>>>> + return;
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> + if (map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled) {
> >>>>>>>> + map->phys_map[cpuid].vcpu = NULL;
> >>>>>>>> + map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled = false;
> >>>>>>>> + kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID, 0);
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> While kvm_set_cpuid() is protected by a spinlock, do kvm_drop_cpuid()
> >>>>>>> and kvm_get_vcpu_by_cpuid() also need it?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> It is good to me that spinlock is added in function kvm_drop_cpuid().
> >>>>>> And thinks for the efforts.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> Bibo Mao
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> static int _kvm_setcsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id, u64 val)
> >>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>> int ret = 0, gintc;
> >>>>>>>> @@ -291,7 +380,8 @@ static int _kvm_setcsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id, u64 val)
> >>>>>>>> kvm_set_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ESTAT, gintc);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> return ret;
> >>>>>>>> - }
> >>>>>>>> + } else if (id == LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID)
> >>>>>>>> + return kvm_set_cpuid(vcpu, val);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, id, val);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> @@ -943,6 +1033,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>>>>>>> hrtimer_cancel(&vcpu->arch.swtimer);
> >>>>>>>> kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
> >>>>>>>> kfree(vcpu->arch.csr);
> >>>>>>>> + kvm_drop_cpuid(vcpu);
> >>>>>>> I think this line should be before the above kfree(), otherwise you
> >>>>>>> get a "use after free".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Huacai
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> /*
> >>>>>>>> * If the vCPU is freed and reused as another vCPU, we don't want the
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
> >>>>>>>> index 0a37f6fa8f2d..6006a28653ad 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
> >>>>>>>> @@ -30,6 +30,14 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
> >>>>>>>> if (!kvm->arch.pgd)
> >>>>>>>> return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> + kvm->arch.phyid_map = kvzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_phyid_map),
> >>>>>>>> + GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> >>>>>>>> + if (!kvm->arch.phyid_map) {
> >>>>>>>> + free_page((unsigned long)kvm->arch.pgd);
> >>>>>>>> + kvm->arch.pgd = NULL;
> >>>>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> kvm_init_vmcs(kvm);
> >>>>>>>> kvm->arch.gpa_size = BIT(cpu_vabits - 1);
> >>>>>>>> kvm->arch.root_level = CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS - 1;
> >>>>>>>> @@ -44,6 +52,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
> >>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i <= kvm->arch.root_level; i++)
> >>>>>>>> kvm->arch.pte_shifts[i] = PAGE_SHIFT + i * (PAGE_SHIFT - 3);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> + spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
> >>>>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> @@ -51,7 +60,9 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>> kvm_destroy_vcpus(kvm);
> >>>>>>>> free_page((unsigned long)kvm->arch.pgd);
> >>>>>>>> + kvfree(kvm->arch.phyid_map);
> >>>>>>>> kvm->arch.pgd = NULL;
> >>>>>>>> + kvm->arch.phyid_map = NULL;
> >>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> 2.39.3
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists