[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240506141801.1165315-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 22:17:59 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: tytso@....edu,
jack@...e.com
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] jbd2: remove dead equality check of j_commit_[sequence/request] in kjournald2
In kjournald2, two equality checks of j_commit_[sequence/request] are
under the same j_state_lock. As j_commit_[sequence/request] are updated
concurrently with j_state_lock held during runtime, the second check is
unnecessary.
The j_commit_sequence is only updated concurrently in
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction with j_state_lock held.
The j_commit_request is only updated concurrently in
__jbd2_log_start_commit with j_state_lock held.
Also see comment in struct journal_s about lock rule of j_commit_sequence
and j_commit_request.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
---
fs/jbd2/journal.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
index 01e33b643e4d..e8f592fbd6e1 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
@@ -224,8 +224,6 @@ static int kjournald2(void *arg)
prepare_to_wait(&journal->j_wait_commit, &wait,
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (journal->j_commit_sequence != journal->j_commit_request)
- should_sleep = 0;
transaction = journal->j_running_transaction;
if (transaction && time_after_eq(jiffies,
transaction->t_expires))
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists