lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240506153528.148d9b18@jic23-huawei>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 15:35:28 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: marc.ferland@...il.com
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marc Ferland
 <marc.ferland@...atest.com>, Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: dac: ad5592r: fix temperature channel scaling
 value

On Wed,  1 May 2024 11:05:54 -0400
marc.ferland@...il.com wrote:

> From: Marc Ferland <marc.ferland@...atest.com>
> 
> The scale value for the temperature channel is (assuming Vref=2.5 and
> the datasheet):
> 
>     376.7897513
> 
> When calculating both val and val2 for the temperature scale we
> use (3767897513/25) and multiply it by Vref (here I assume 2500mV) to
> obtain:
> 
>   2500 * (3767897513/25) ==> 376789751300
> 
> Finally we divide with remainder by 10^9 to get:
> 
>     val = 376
>     val2 = 789751300
> 
> However, we return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO (should have been NANO) as
> the scale type. So when converting the raw temperature value to the
> 'processed' temperature value we will get (assuming raw=810,
> offset=-753):
> 
>     processed = (raw + offset) * scale_val
>               = (810 + -753) * 376
> 	      = 21432
> 
>     processed += div((raw + offset) * scale_val2, 10^6)
>               += div((810 + -753) * 789751300, 10^6)
> 	      += 45015
>     ==> 66447
>     ==> 66.4 Celcius  
> 
> instead of the expected 21.5 Celsius.
> 
> Fix this issue by changing IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO to
> IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Ferland <marc.ferland@...atest.com>
+CC Nuno.

Seems obviously correct to me so I'll apply it to the fixes-togreg
branch of iio.git.  I've been wrong before though so ideally would like
one of the ADI team to sanity check this.

I'll add the fixes tag as well and mark it for stable. This goes all the
way back.

Fixes: 56ca9db862bf ("iio: dac: Add support for the AD5592R/AD5593R ADCs/DACs")


> ---
> Change in v2:
>  - Improve commit message as suggested by Jonathan.
> 
>  drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> index 076bc9ecfb49..4763402dbcd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5592r-base.c
> @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static int ad5592r_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  			s64 tmp = *val * (3767897513LL / 25LL);
>  			*val = div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000LL, val2);
>  
> -			return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +			return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
>  		}
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> 
> base-commit: 98369dccd2f8e16bf4c6621053af7aa4821dcf8e


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ