linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] drivers: use __free attribute instead of of_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2398ca58-eafc-46df-92c1-c03cd920fd06@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 17:30:49 +0200
From: Vincenzo Mezzela <vincenzo.mezzela@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com, javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com,
 julia.lawall@...ia.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
 skhan@...uxfoundation.org, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] drivers: use __free attribute instead of
 of_node_put()


On 01/05/24 15:06, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 02:33:39PM +0200, Vincenzo Mezzela wrote:
>> On 01/05/24 12:48, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 11:43:13AM +0200, Vincenzo Mezzela wrote:
>>>> Introduce the __free attribute for scope-based resource management.
>>>> Resources allocated with __free are automatically released at the end of
>>>> the scope. This enhancement aims to mitigate memory management issues
>>>> associated with forgetting to release resources by utilizing __free
>>>> instead of of_node_put().
>>>>
>>>> The declaration of the device_node used within the do-while loops is
>>>> moved directly within the loop so that the resource is automatically
>>>> freed at the end of each iteration.
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Mezzela <vincenzo.mezzela@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 51 +++++++++++++++---------------------
>>>>    1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>> How was all of this tested?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just cross-compiled it for RISC-V to enable the config
>> GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
>> and include arch_topology.c as well.
> Cross-compile is nice, how about running it?
>
>> Do you have any suggestion to trigger the affected code and perform some
>> testing?
> That is up to you to determine if you wish to modify it :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi,

I've successfully run it on QEMU. There are no differences in the dmesg 
after applying the patches.

Furthermore, I've tracked the execution of the parse_dt_topology() which 
is calling all the functions that I've modified with the patches and I 
checked that of_node_put was correctly called at the end of each scope.

Is there anything else that can be done to further testing this changes?

Thanks,

Vincenzo