[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZjpASVk1GezAzDAG@x1>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:52:57 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, jolsa@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, irogers@...gle.com,
segher@...nel.crashing.org, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akanksha@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/9] tools/perf: Fix a comment about multi_regs in
extract_reg_offset function
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:40:15PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 5:19 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Fix a comment in function which explains how multi_regs field gets set
> > for an instruction. In the example, "mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4)", the
> > comment mistakenly referred to "dst_multi_regs = 0". Correct it to use
> > "src_multi_regs = 0"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cherry picked this one into perf-tools-next.
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists