linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC RESEND 4/6] iommu/riscv: support nested iommu for getting iommu hardware information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240507145456.GH901876@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:54:56 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Cc: joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com,
	tjeznach@...osinc.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
	aou@...s.berkeley.edu, kevin.tian@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC RESEND 4/6] iommu/riscv: support nested iommu for
 getting iommu hardware information

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:25:58PM +0800, Zong Li wrote:
> +{
> +	struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
> +	struct iommu_hw_info_riscv_iommu *info;
> +
> +	if (!iommu)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);

This is not possible, don't include impossible checks like this.

> +	info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!info)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	info->capability = iommu->caps;
> +	info->fctl = riscv_iommu_readl(iommu, RISCV_IOMMU_REG_FCTL);
> +
> +	*length = sizeof(*info);
> +	*type = IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_RISCV_IOMMU;
> +
> +	return info;
> +}
> +
>  static int riscv_iommu_device_domain_type(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1560,6 +1582,7 @@ static void riscv_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>  static const struct iommu_ops riscv_iommu_ops = {
>  	.pgsize_bitmap = SZ_4K,
>  	.of_xlate = riscv_iommu_of_xlate,
> +	.hw_info = riscv_iommu_hw_info,
>  	.identity_domain = &riscv_iommu_identity_domain,
>  	.blocked_domain = &riscv_iommu_blocking_domain,
>  	.release_domain = &riscv_iommu_blocking_domain,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> index 1dfeaa2e649e..ec9aafd7d373 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> @@ -475,15 +475,28 @@ struct iommu_hw_info_vtd {
>  	__aligned_u64 ecap_reg;
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * struct iommu_hw_info_riscv_iommu - RISCV IOMMU hardware information
> + *
> + * @capability: Value of RISC-V IOMMU capability register
> + * @fctl: Value of RISC-V IOMMU feature control register
> + */

Please call out explictly what spec these values come from.

> +struct iommu_hw_info_riscv_iommu {
> +	__aligned_u64 capability;
> +	__u32 fctl;
> +};

Add explicit padding here

Jason