[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZjpB65YJcMGIJFoH@x1>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:59:55 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com,
scclevenger@...amperecomputing.com, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com, mike.leach@...aro.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] coresight: Use per-sink trace ID maps for Perf
sessions
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:01:07AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> On 03/05/2024 21:23, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > I guess I can pick the tooling part now, right? Further reviewing would
> > be nice tho.
> Is it ok if we wait for the driver changes to be merged first? There
> might some review comments which need a format change to the packets and
> then a re-write of the tool changes.
Ok
> You could take 1 and 2 though because they're unrelated.
Done.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists