linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: mobileye,eyeq5-clk: drop bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fd0228f2-2f41-4194-b804-7a90ea3a6091@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 17:34:24 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
 Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: mobileye,eyeq5-clk: drop
 bindings

On 07/05/2024 17:07, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Fri May 3, 2024 at 6:05 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/05/2024 17:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 03/05/2024 16:20, Théo Lebrun wrote:
>>>> Switch from sub-nodes in system-controller for each functionality to a
>>>> single node representing the entire OLB instance. dt-bindings is
>>>> unnecessary and soc/mobileye/mobileye,eyeq5-olb.yaml will inherit all
>>>> properties.
>>>
>>> Why changing this? You just added these bindings not so long time ago...
>>> This is very confusing to push bindings and then immediately ask to
>>> remove them.
> 
> See this revision as a proposal of something that has been asked
> multiple times in previous reviews. See message from Stephen Boyd on

That's driver, we talk about bindings.

> last revision [0], or discussion with Rob Herring on much earlier
> revision [1].
> 
> Proposal from Stephen Boyd of using auxiliary devices makes sense, that
> could be the future direction of this series. It won't change the
> dt-bindings aspect of it, only the driver implementations.
> 
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/daa732cb31d947c308513b535930c729.sboyd@kernel.org/
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240124151405.GA930997-robh@kernel.org/

So after Robs comment above, you still pushed the wrong approach and now
you revert it?

Why v7 was sent ignoring Rob's comments:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240221-mbly-clk-v7-3-31d4ce3630c3@bootlin.com/

Best regards,
Krzysztof