linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/panel: himax-hx83102: Break out as separate driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Wjgc4F2zMhzeLY1hmRN1PTjEpZ7nbYBCp8RPMM7LhPbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 09:29:13 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: cong yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc: sam@...nborg.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch, 
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, 
	robh+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, airlied@...il.com, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xuxinxiong@...qin.corp-partner.google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/panel: himax-hx83102: Break out as separate driver

Hi,

On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:44 AM cong yang
<yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
>
> > Speaking of which, some of the panels that you add to this driver seem
> > to disable extended commands at the end of their init sequence, but
> > this one doesn't. Should it?
>
> I  have confirmed with himax that disable extended commands  used
> at the end to prevent accidental writing. And our inital code has been
> confirmed by himax before FSI. Considering that this has been on the
> market for a long time and there are no feedback issues, I think it should
> remain the same as `panel-boe-tv101wum-nl6.c`.  What do you think?

It's fine with me to leave it the same as `panel-boe-tv101wum-nl6.c`
had it. At least it should be more obvious to people that there's a
difference now. ;-)

-Doug