[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240507183430.4e956c45@p-imbrenda.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 18:34:30 +0200
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Vasily Gorbik
<gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian
Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle
<svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald
Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox
<willy@...radead.org>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] s390: PG_arch_1+folio cleanups for uv+hugetlb
On Mon, 6 May 2024 10:38:30 +0200
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 08:49:31PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 12.04.24 16:21, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > This is v2 of [1] with changed subject:
> > > "[PATCH v1 0/5] s390: page_mapcount(), page_has_private() and PG_arch_1"
> > >
> > > Rebased on s390x/features which contains the page_mapcount() and
> > > page_has_private() cleanups, and some PG_arch_1 cleanups from Willy. To
> > > compensate, I added some more cleanups ;)
> > >
> > > One "easy" fix upfront. Another issue I spotted is documented in [1].
> > >
> > > Once this hits upstream, we can remove HAVE_ARCH_MAKE_PAGE_ACCESSIBLE
> > > from core-mm and s390x, so only the folio variant will remain.
> >
> > Ping.
>
> Claudio, Janosch, this series requires your review.
oops! I had started reviewing it, but then other things got in the
way...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists