[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73a1dc2e-cd7c-4fb0-a2cd-181155776490@web.de>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 18:51:40 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>, Peiyang Wang
<wangpeiyang1@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Hao Chen <chenhao418@...wei.com>,
Jie Wang <wangjie125@...wei.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Yonglong Liu <liuyonglong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 net 1/7] net: hns3: using user configure after hardware
reset
Can any wording adjustments be a bit nicer?
> When a reset occurring, it's supposed to recover user's configuration.
An user configuration should be recovered after a reset occurred.
…
> and will be scheduled updated. Consider the case that reset was happened
and the schedule will be updated. Consider also the case that reset happened
…
> To avoid aboved situation, this patch introduced …
* Would you like to avoid another typo here?
* How do you think about to use imperative wordings for improved change descriptions?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9-rc7#n94
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists