[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16ab2040-9d99-41b8-8b9d-39b0753533c6@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 09:53:34 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fault: speed up uffd-unit-test by 10x: rate-limit
"MCE: Killing" logs
On 5/7/24 9:43 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 07.05.24 18:28, John Hubbard wrote:
>> On 5/7/24 1:13 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
..
>> I'd like to just do this patch almost as-is, just with a fixed up
>> subject,
>> perhaps:
>>
>> x86/fault: rate-limit to avoid flooding dmesg with "MCE: Killing"
>> reports
>>
>> Yes?
>
>
> Makes sense to me (and thanks for confirming that we don't need
> complexity elsewhere).
>
> I think we at least need "Fixes:" (not sure if stable is warranted as
> well, 1b0a151c10a6d823f033023b9fdd9af72a89591b didn't CC stable).
>
> Consider adding a link to the report in that thread.
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>
OK, there's enough changes to the commit description that I'll go ahead
and send a v2, with a new subject line, a Fixes:, your Ack, a link to
the other conversation, and maybe reword a bit based on your feedback
too.
Thanks for the review and the Ack!
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists