lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:06:51 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tao Su <tao1.su@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, edliaw@...gle.com,
 ivan.orlov0322@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
 tiwai@...e.com, shuah@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
 bongsu.jeon@...sung.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
 jarkko@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Add _GNU_SOURCE definition when including
 kselftest_harness.h

On Tue,  7 May 2024 14:35:34 +0800 Tao Su <tao1.su@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> asprintf() is declared in stdio.h when defining _GNU_SOURCE, but stdio.h
> is so common that many files don’t define _GNU_SOURCE before including
> stdio.h, and defining _GNU_SOURCE after including stdio.h will no longer
> take effect.
> 
> Since kselftest_harness.h introduces asprintf(), it is necessary to add
> _GNU_SOURCE definition in all selftests including kselftest_harness.h,
> otherwise, there will be warnings or even errors during compilation.
> There are already many selftests that define _GNU_SOURCE or put the
> include of kselftest_harness.h at the very beginning of the .c file, just
> add the _GNU_SOURCE definition in the tests that have compilation warnings.

That asprintf() continues to cause problems.  How about we just remove
it? Do the malloc(snprintf(str, 0, ...)) separately?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ