linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 02/20] KVM: x86: Add hook for determining max NPT mapping level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 19:48:15 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, jroedel@...e.de,
 thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com, ardb@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
 vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
 peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
 rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com, bp@...en8.de,
 vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com,
 tony.luck@...el.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
 alpergun@...gle.com, jarkko@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com,
 nikunj.dadhania@....com, pankaj.gupta@....com, liam.merwick@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 02/20] KVM: x86: Add hook for determining max NPT
 mapping level

On 5/1/24 10:51, Michael Roth wrote:
> In the case of SEV-SNP, whether or not a 2MB page can be mapped via a
> 2MB mapping in the guest's nested page table depends on whether or not
> any subpages within the range have already been initialized as private
> in the RMP table. The existing mixed-attribute tracking in KVM is
> insufficient here, for instance:
> 
> - gmem allocates 2MB page
> - guest issues PVALIDATE on 2MB page
> - guest later converts a subpage to shared
> - SNP host code issues PSMASH to split 2MB RMP mapping to 4K
> - KVM MMU splits NPT mapping to 4K
> - guest later converts that shared page back to private
> 
> At this point there are no mixed attributes, and KVM would normally
> allow for 2MB NPT mappings again, but this is actually not allowed
> because the RMP table mappings are 4K and cannot be promoted on the
> hypervisor side, so the NPT mappings must still be limited to 4K to
> match this.
> 
> Add a hook to determine the max NPT mapping size in situations like
> this.
> 
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h |  1 +
>   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |  1 +
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c             | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>   3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> index c81990937ab4..566d19b02483 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(vcpu_get_apicv_inhibit_reasons);
>   KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(get_untagged_addr)
>   KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(alloc_apic_backing_page)
>   KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(gmem_prepare)
> +KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(private_max_mapping_level)
>   KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(gmem_invalidate)
>   
>   #undef KVM_X86_OP
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index c6c5018376be..87265b73906a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1816,6 +1816,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>   	void *(*alloc_apic_backing_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>   	int (*gmem_prepare)(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn, gfn_t gfn, int max_order);
>   	void (*gmem_invalidate)(kvm_pfn_t start, kvm_pfn_t end);
> +	int (*private_max_mapping_level)(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn);
>   };
>   
>   struct kvm_x86_nested_ops {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 510eb1117012..0d556da052f6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -4271,6 +4271,20 @@ static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
>   	return PG_LEVEL_4K;
>   }
>   
> +static u8 kvm_max_private_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> +					u8 max_level, int gmem_order)
> +{
> +	if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
> +		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
> +
> +	max_level = min(kvm_max_level_for_order(gmem_order), max_level);
> +	if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
> +		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
> +
> +	return min(max_level,
> +		   static_call(kvm_x86_private_max_mapping_level)(kvm, pfn));
> +}

Since you're returning 0 both as a default and, later in the series, for non-SNP guests, you need to treat 0 as "don't care":

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index de35dee25bf6..62ad38b2a8c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -4274,6 +4274,8 @@ static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
  static u8 kvm_max_private_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
  					u8 max_level, int gmem_order)
  {
+	u8 req_max_level;
+
  	if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
  		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
  
@@ -4281,8 +4283,11 @@ static u8 kvm_max_private_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
  	if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
  		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
  
-	return min(max_level,
-		   static_call(kvm_x86_private_max_mapping_level)(kvm, pfn));
+	req_max_level = static_call(kvm_x86_private_max_mapping_level)(kvm, pfn);
+	if (req_max_level)
+		max_level = min(max_level, req_max_level);
+
+	return req_max_level;
  }
  
  static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,


Not beautiful but it does the job I guess.

Paolo