[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240507175628.2460390-1-daeho43@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:56:28 -0700
From: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: allow dirty sections with zero valid block for checkpoint disabled
From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
Following the semantic for dirty segments in checkpoint disabled mode,
apply the same rule to dirty sections.
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 6474b7338e81..2463398b243f 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -771,8 +771,11 @@ static void __locate_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
block_t valid_blocks =
get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true);
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, unlikely(!valid_blocks ||
- valid_blocks == CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)));
+ if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, unlikely(!valid_blocks));
+
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, unlikely(valid_blocks ==
+ CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)));
if (!IS_CURSEC(sbi, secno))
set_bit(secno, dirty_i->dirty_secmap);
--
2.45.0.rc1.225.g2a3ae87e7f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists