lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86749724-81fe-4d54-b909-e4ca4171c6ce@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 20:30:15 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>,
 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, willy@...radead.org,
 sj@...nel.org, maskray@...gle.com, ziy@...dia.com, ryan.roberts@....com,
 21cnbao@...il.com, mhocko@...e.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com,
 zokeefe@...gle.com, shy828301@...il.com, xiehuan09@...il.com,
 libang.li@...group.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
 songmuchun@...edance.com, peterx@...hat.com, minchan@...nel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into
 pagewalk loop

On 07.05.24 19:38, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 19:33:05 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Well, which series are we talking about?  "mm/madvise: enhance
>>> lazyfreeing with mTHP in madvise_free v10" or ""Reclaim lazyfree THP
>>> without splitting v4" or both?
>>
>> See my other mail, "mm/madvise: enhance lazyfreeing with mTHP in
>> madvise_free v10" is all acked/reviewed and good to go.
>>
>>>
>>> And how significant are the needed fixup patches?
>>>
>>> And what is our confidence level after those fixups are in place?
>>
>> I'm afraid I won't have time to review this series this/next week, so I
>> cannot tell. I already assumed this would not be 6.10 material.
> 
> OK, I've dropped the series "Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting",
> v4.  Let's revisit in the next cycle.

Thanks, should be more than ready by then :)

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ