linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 04/19] ACPI: processor: Return an error if acpi_processor_get_info() fails in processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gCgWsbUDmhU2vPiz6dMwefdmRYthyxQoGiEhvPqwDpKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 20:55:39 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org, 
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, 
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, 
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, linuxarm@...wei.com, 
	justin.he@....com, jianyong.wu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/19] ACPI: processor: Return an error if
 acpi_processor_get_info() fails in processor_add()

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 4:26 PM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Rafael observed [1] that returning 0 from processor_add() will result in
> acpi_default_enumeration() being called which will attempt to create a
> platform device, but that makes little sense when the processor is known
> to be not available.  So just return the error code from acpi_processor_get_info()
> instead.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJZ5v0iKU8ra9jR+EmgxbuNm=Uwx2m1-8vn_RAZ+aCiUVLe3Pw@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Thank you!

> ---
> v9: New patch following through from Gavin pointing out a memory leak later
>     in the series.
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index 161c95c9d60a..5f062806ca40 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>
>         result = acpi_processor_get_info(device);
>         if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */
> -               return 0;
> +               return result;
>
>         BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>