lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZjqU0fbzHrlnad8D@equinox>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 21:53:37 +0100
From: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cdrom: rearrange last_media_change check to avoid
 unintentional overflow

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 04:54:04AM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> When running syzkaller with the newly reintroduced signed integer wrap
> sanitizer we encounter this splat:
> 
> [  366.015950] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c:2361:33
> [  366.021089] -9223372036854775808 - 346321 cannot be represented in type '__s64' (aka 'long long')
> [  366.025894] program syz-executor.4 is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert it to SG_IO
> [  366.027502] CPU: 5 PID: 28472 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-00035-gb3ef86b5a957 #1
> [  366.027512] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
> [  366.027518] Call Trace:
> [  366.027523]  <TASK>
> [  366.027533]  dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0
> [  366.027899]  handle_overflow+0x171/0x1b0
> [  366.038787] ata1.00: invalid multi_count 32 ignored
> [  366.043924]  cdrom_ioctl+0x2c3f/0x2d10
> [  366.063932]  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0xe6/0x130
> [  366.071923]  sr_block_ioctl+0x15d/0x1d0
> [  366.074624]  ? __pfx_sr_block_ioctl+0x10/0x10
> [  366.077642]  blkdev_ioctl+0x419/0x500
> [  366.080231]  ? __pfx_blkdev_ioctl+0x10/0x10
> ...
> 
> Historically, the signed integer overflow sanitizer did not work in the
> kernel due to its interaction with `-fwrapv` but this has since been
> changed [1] in the newest version of Clang. It was re-enabled in the
> kernel with Commit 557f8c582a9ba8ab ("ubsan: Reintroduce signed overflow
> sanitizer").
> 
> Let's rearrange the check to not perform any arithmetic, thus not
> tripping the sanitizer.
> ...

Hi Justin,

Thanks for the patch, looks good to me and seems like a sensible change.
Reviewed and build/runtime tested, I will send on for inclusion.

Reviewed-by: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>

Regards,
Phil

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ