[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000000000002223bc0617e437cc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 14:53:25 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+d24a87174027a66198b8@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [block?] WARNING: locking bug in mempool_init_node
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 3d25a941ea50 Merge tag 'block-6.9-20240503' of git://git.k..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16314b1f180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=45d8db3acdc1ccc6
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d24a87174027a66198b8
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
userspace arch: i386
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-3d25a941.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/49d9f26b0beb/vmlinux-3d25a941.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d2c424c14fff/bzImage-3d25a941.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+d24a87174027a66198b8@...kaller.appspotmail.com
------------[ cut here ]------------
Looking for class "c->lock" with key __key.0, but found a different class "&c->lock" with the same key
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 24525 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:932 look_up_lock_class+0x133/0x140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:932
Modules linked in:
CPU: 2 PID: 24525 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00227-g3d25a941ea50 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:look_up_lock_class+0x133/0x140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:932
Code: c7 c7 40 b7 0c 8b e8 5c 55 7e f6 90 0f 0b 90 90 90 31 db eb be c6 05 5a 61 b4 04 01 90 48 c7 c7 60 ba 0c 8b e8 3e 55 7e f6 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 e9 62 ff ff ff 0f 1f 40 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 0018:ffffc90002b36eb8 EFLAGS: 00010082
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff93d6d800 RCX: ffffc90034a01000
RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff81513a06 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffffffff94661890 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000006b6f6f4c R12: ffffe8ffad4d9550
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffff94649aa0
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88802c400000(0063) knlGS:00000000f5ebab40
CS: 0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000f7452054 CR3: 000000004c5e6000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
register_lock_class+0xb1/0x1230 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1284
__lock_acquire+0x111/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5014
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
___slab_alloc+0x789/0x16d0 mm/slub.c:3569
__slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x56/0xb0 mm/slub.c:3610
__slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline]
kmem_cache_alloc+0x2e9/0x320 mm/slub.c:3852
mempool_init_node+0x31e/0x760 mm/mempool.c:217
mempool_init+0x3a/0x50 mm/mempool.c:246
mempool_init_slab_pool include/linux/mempool.h:68 [inline]
bioset_init+0x324/0x7a0 block/bio.c:1752
bch2_fs_fs_io_direct_init+0x58/0x90 fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c:679
bch2_fs_alloc+0x1bdf/0x25c0 fs/bcachefs/super.c:938
bch2_fs_open+0x713/0x10f0 fs/bcachefs/super.c:2081
bch2_mount+0xd41/0x1090 fs/bcachefs/fs.c:1903
legacy_get_tree+0x109/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:662
vfs_get_tree+0x8f/0x380 fs/super.c:1779
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3352 [inline]
path_mount+0x6e1/0x1f10 fs/namespace.c:3679
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3875 [inline]
__ia32_sys_mount+0x295/0x320 fs/namespace.c:3875
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x75/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
RIP: 0023:0xf72c8579
Code: b8 01 10 06 03 74 b4 01 10 07 03 74 b0 01 10 08 03 74 d8 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90 90 90 90 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00000000f5eba400 EFLAGS: 00000292 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000015
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000f5eba460 RCX: 0000000020011a40
RDX: 0000000020011a00 RSI: 0000000001200014 RDI: 00000000f5eba4a0
RBP: 00000000f5eba460 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000296 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
</TASK>
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess), 2 bytes skipped:
0: 10 06 adc %al,(%rsi)
2: 03 74 b4 01 add 0x1(%rsp,%rsi,4),%esi
6: 10 07 adc %al,(%rdi)
8: 03 74 b0 01 add 0x1(%rax,%rsi,4),%esi
c: 10 08 adc %cl,(%rax)
e: 03 74 d8 01 add 0x1(%rax,%rbx,8),%esi
1e: 00 51 52 add %dl,0x52(%rcx)
21: 55 push %rbp
22: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
24: 0f 34 sysenter
26: cd 80 int $0x80
* 28: 5d pop %rbp <-- trapping instruction
29: 5a pop %rdx
2a: 59 pop %rcx
2b: c3 ret
2c: 90 nop
2d: 90 nop
2e: 90 nop
2f: 90 nop
30: 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%rsi,%riz,1),%esi
37: 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%rsi,%riz,1),%esi
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists