[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240507225910.390914-18-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 18:58:40 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
shuah@...nel.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 18/19] selftests: sud_test: return correct emulated syscall value on RISC-V
From: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>
[ Upstream commit 17c67ed752d6a456602b3dbb25c5ae4d3de5deab ]
Currently, the sud_test expects the emulated syscall to return the
emulated syscall number. This assumption only works on architectures
were the syscall calling convention use the same register for syscall
number/syscall return value. This is not the case for RISC-V and thus
the return value must be also emulated using the provided ucontext.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206134438.473166-1-cleger@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
.../selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c
index b5d592d4099e8..d975a67673299 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c
@@ -158,6 +158,20 @@ static void handle_sigsys(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ucontext)
/* In preparation for sigreturn. */
SYSCALL_DISPATCH_OFF(glob_sel);
+
+ /*
+ * The tests for argument handling assume that `syscall(x) == x`. This
+ * is a NOP on x86 because the syscall number is passed in %rax, which
+ * happens to also be the function ABI return register. Other
+ * architectures may need to swizzle the arguments around.
+ */
+#if defined(__riscv)
+/* REG_A7 is not defined in libc headers */
+# define REG_A7 (REG_A0 + 7)
+
+ ((ucontext_t *)ucontext)->uc_mcontext.__gregs[REG_A0] =
+ ((ucontext_t *)ucontext)->uc_mcontext.__gregs[REG_A7];
+#endif
}
TEST(dispatch_and_return)
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists