| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <5022fa6a280c3fa852bf3724149251c41ee8303f.1715059894.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 13:52:12 +0800
From: Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
jreuter@...na.de,
horms@...nel.org,
Markus.Elfring@....de,
dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
lars@...bit.com,
Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH net v4 1/4] ax25: Use kernel universal linked list to implement ax25_dev_list
The origin ax25_dev_list implements its own single linked list,
which is complicated and error-prone. For example, when deleting
the node of ax25_dev_list in ax25_dev_device_down(), we have to
operate on the head node and other nodes separately.
This patch uses kernel universal linked list to replace original
ax25_dev_list, which make the operation of ax25_dev_list easier.
There are two points that need to notice:
[1] We should add a check to judge whether the list is empty before
INIT_LIST_HEAD in ax25_dev_device_up(), otherwise it will empty the
list for each new ax25_dev added.
[2] We should do "dev->ax25_ptr = ax25_dev;" and "dev->ax25_ptr = NULL;"
while holding the spinlock, otherwise the ax25_dev_device_up() and
ax25_dev_device_down() could race, we're not guaranteed to find a match
ax25_dev in ax25_dev_device_down().
Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>
---
Changes in v4:
- Make the linux list API as a separate update step.
- Add a check before INIT_LIST_HEAD.
- Do "dev->ax25_ptr = ax25_dev;" while holding the spinlock.
include/net/ax25.h | 4 ++--
net/ax25/ax25_dev.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/ax25.h b/include/net/ax25.h
index 0d939e5aee4..92c6aa4f9a6 100644
--- a/include/net/ax25.h
+++ b/include/net/ax25.h
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ typedef struct {
struct ctl_table;
typedef struct ax25_dev {
- struct ax25_dev *next;
+ struct list_head list;
struct net_device *dev;
netdevice_tracker dev_tracker;
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ int ax25_addr_size(const ax25_digi *);
void ax25_digi_invert(const ax25_digi *, ax25_digi *);
/* ax25_dev.c */
-extern ax25_dev *ax25_dev_list;
+static struct list_head ax25_dev_list;
extern spinlock_t ax25_dev_lock;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AX25)
diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c b/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c
index 282ec581c07..d4e1e36a6a8 100644
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c
@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/fcntl.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
-ax25_dev *ax25_dev_list;
DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ax25_dev_lock);
ax25_dev *ax25_addr_ax25dev(ax25_address *addr)
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ ax25_dev *ax25_addr_ax25dev(ax25_address *addr)
ax25_dev *ax25_dev, *res = NULL;
spin_lock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock);
- for (ax25_dev = ax25_dev_list; ax25_dev != NULL; ax25_dev = ax25_dev->next)
+ list_for_each_entry(ax25_dev, &ax25_dev_list, list)
if (ax25cmp(addr, (const ax25_address *)ax25_dev->dev->dev_addr) == 0) {
res = ax25_dev;
ax25_dev_hold(ax25_dev);
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ void ax25_dev_device_up(struct net_device *dev)
{
ax25_dev *ax25_dev;
+ /* Initialized the list for the first entry */
+ if (!ax25_dev_list.next)
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ax25_dev_list);
ax25_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ax25_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ax25_dev) {
printk(KERN_ERR "AX.25: ax25_dev_device_up - out of memory\n");
@@ -59,7 +62,6 @@ void ax25_dev_device_up(struct net_device *dev)
}
refcount_set(&ax25_dev->refcount, 1);
- dev->ax25_ptr = ax25_dev;
ax25_dev->dev = dev;
netdev_hold(dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
ax25_dev->forward = NULL;
@@ -85,8 +87,8 @@ void ax25_dev_device_up(struct net_device *dev)
#endif
spin_lock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock);
- ax25_dev->next = ax25_dev_list;
- ax25_dev_list = ax25_dev;
+ list_add(&ax25_dev->list, &ax25_dev_list);
+ dev->ax25_ptr = ax25_dev;
spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock);
ax25_dev_hold(ax25_dev);
@@ -111,32 +113,25 @@ void ax25_dev_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
/*
* Remove any packet forwarding that points to this device.
*/
- for (s = ax25_dev_list; s != NULL; s = s->next)
+ list_for_each_entry(s, &ax25_dev_list, list)
if (s->forward == dev)
s->forward = NULL;
- if ((s = ax25_dev_list) == ax25_dev) {
- ax25_dev_list = s->next;
- goto unlock_put;
- }
-
- while (s != NULL && s->next != NULL) {
- if (s->next == ax25_dev) {
- s->next = ax25_dev->next;
+ list_for_each_entry(s, &ax25_dev_list, list) {
+ if (s == ax25_dev) {
+ list_del(&s->list);
goto unlock_put;
}
-
- s = s->next;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock);
dev->ax25_ptr = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock);
ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev);
return;
unlock_put:
+ dev->ax25_ptr = NULL;
spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock);
ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev);
- dev->ax25_ptr = NULL;
netdev_put(dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker);
ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev);
}
@@ -200,16 +195,13 @@ struct net_device *ax25_fwd_dev(struct net_device *dev)
*/
void __exit ax25_dev_free(void)
{
- ax25_dev *s, *ax25_dev;
+ ax25_dev *s, *n;
spin_lock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock);
- ax25_dev = ax25_dev_list;
- while (ax25_dev != NULL) {
- s = ax25_dev;
- netdev_put(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker);
- ax25_dev = ax25_dev->next;
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(s, n, &ax25_dev_list, list) {
+ netdev_put(s->dev, &s->dev_tracker);
+ list_del(&s->list);
kfree(s);
}
- ax25_dev_list = NULL;
spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock);
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists