linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND net v4 0/4] ax25: Fix issues of ax25_dev and net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0334480f-1545-455b-8d5f-0f7a804ad186@web.de>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 09:30:16 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
 Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Jörg Reuter <jreuter@...na.de>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net v4 0/4] ax25: Fix issues of ax25_dev and
 net_device

…
> You can see the former discussion in the following link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240501060218.32898-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn/
…

Does this change approach represent another subsequent patch version
instead of a “RESEND”?

How do you think about to improve patch changelogs accordingly?

Regards,
Markus