linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ufs-exynos support for Tensor GS101

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1o79ixuya.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 21:38:29 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org,
        robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, andre.draszik@...aro.org,
        saravanak@...gle.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ufs-exynos support for Tensor GS101


Peter,

> This series adds support to the ufs-exynos driver for Tensor gs101
> found in Pixel 6. It was send previously in [1] and [2] but included
> the other clock, phy and DTS parts. This series has been split into
> just the ufs-exynos part to hopefully make things easier.
>
> With this series, plus the phy, clock and dts changes UFS is functional
> upstream for Pixel 6. The SKhynix HN8T05BZGKX015 can be enumerated,
> partitions mounted etc.
>
> The series is split into some prepatory patches for ufs-exynos and a final
> patch that adds the gs101 support.
>
> Note the sysreg clock has been moved to ufs node as fine grained clock
> control around the syscon sysreg register accesses doesn't result in
> functional UFS.

Applied to 6.10/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering