linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND v3 4/7] memory: tegra: Change macros to interpret parameter as integer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240507093056.3921-5-diogo.ivo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Date: Tue,  7 May 2024 10:30:47 +0100
From: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...nico.ulisboa.pt>
To: krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
	thierry.reding@...il.com,
	jonathanh@...dia.com,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...nico.ulisboa.pt>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v3 4/7] memory: tegra: Change macros to interpret parameter as integer

Convert the macros that manipulate the delay values to interpret their
index parameter as an integer to allow the introduction of loops.

Signed-off-by: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...nico.ulisboa.pt>
---
Changes in v2:
 - Add () around dev macro parameter

 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-cc-r21021.c | 33 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-cc-r21021.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-cc-r21021.c
index a9e19dfa9856..bfb01918270e 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-cc-r21021.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-cc-r21021.c
@@ -75,29 +75,29 @@ enum {
  * The division portion of the average operation.
  */
 #define __AVERAGE_PTFV(dev)						\
-	({ next->ptfv_list[PTFV_DQSOSC_MOVAVG_ ## dev ## _INDEX] =	\
-	   next->ptfv_list[PTFV_DQSOSC_MOVAVG_ ## dev ## _INDEX] /	\
+	({ next->ptfv_list[(dev)] =					\
+	   next->ptfv_list[(dev)] /					\
 	   next->ptfv_list[PTFV_DVFS_SAMPLES_INDEX]; })
 
 /*
  * Convert val to fixed point and add it to the temporary average.
  */
 #define __INCREMENT_PTFV(dev, val)					\
-	({ next->ptfv_list[PTFV_DQSOSC_MOVAVG_ ## dev ## _INDEX] +=	\
+	({ next->ptfv_list[(dev)] +=					\
 	   ((val) * MOVAVG_PRECISION_FACTOR); })
 
 /*
  * Convert a moving average back to integral form and return the value.
  */
 #define __MOVAVG_AC(timing, dev)					\
-	((timing)->ptfv_list[PTFV_DQSOSC_MOVAVG_ ## dev ## _INDEX] /	\
+	((timing)->ptfv_list[(dev)] /					\
 	 MOVAVG_PRECISION_FACTOR)
 
 /* Weighted update. */
 #define __WEIGHTED_UPDATE_PTFV(dev, nval)				\
 	do {								\
 		int w = PTFV_MOVAVG_WEIGHT_INDEX;			\
-		int dqs = PTFV_DQSOSC_MOVAVG_ ## dev ## _INDEX;		\
+		int dqs = (dev);						\
 									\
 		next->ptfv_list[dqs] =					\
 			((nval * MOVAVG_PRECISION_FACTOR) +		\
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ enum {
 
 /* Access a particular average. */
 #define __MOVAVG(timing, dev)                      \
-	((timing)->ptfv_list[PTFV_DQSOSC_MOVAVG_ ## dev ## _INDEX])
+	((timing)->ptfv_list[(dev)])
 
 static u32 update_clock_tree_delay(struct tegra210_emc *emc, int type)
 {
@@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ static u32 periodic_compensation_handler(struct tegra210_emc *emc, u32 type,
 	   (nt)->ptfv_list[PTFV_DVFS_SAMPLES_INDEX]; })
 
 	u32 i, adel = 0, samples = next->ptfv_list[PTFV_DVFS_SAMPLES_INDEX];
+	u32 idx;
 
 	if (!next->periodic_training)
 		return 0;
@@ -431,24 +432,12 @@ static u32 periodic_compensation_handler(struct tegra210_emc *emc, u32 type,
 			 * calibration then we can reuse the previous
 			 * frequencies EMA data.
 			 */
-			__COPY_EMA(next, last, C0D0U0);
-			__COPY_EMA(next, last, C0D0U1);
-			__COPY_EMA(next, last, C1D0U0);
-			__COPY_EMA(next, last, C1D0U1);
-			__COPY_EMA(next, last, C0D1U0);
-			__COPY_EMA(next, last, C0D1U1);
-			__COPY_EMA(next, last, C1D1U0);
-			__COPY_EMA(next, last, C1D1U1);
+			for (idx = 0; idx < DRAM_CLKTREE_NUM; idx++)
+				__COPY_EMA(next, last, idx);
 		} else {
 			/* Reset the EMA.*/
-			__MOVAVG(next, C0D0U0) = 0;
-			__MOVAVG(next, C0D0U1) = 0;
-			__MOVAVG(next, C1D0U0) = 0;
-			__MOVAVG(next, C1D0U1) = 0;
-			__MOVAVG(next, C0D1U0) = 0;
-			__MOVAVG(next, C0D1U1) = 0;
-			__MOVAVG(next, C1D1U0) = 0;
-			__MOVAVG(next, C1D1U1) = 0;
+			for (idx = 0; idx < DRAM_CLKTREE_NUM; idx++)
+				__MOVAVG(next, idx) = 0;
 
 			for (i = 0; i < samples; i++) {
 				/* Generate next sample of data. */
-- 
2.44.0