linux-kernel - [PATCH 38/48] rcu: Allocate WQ with WQ_MEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240507093530.3043-39-urezki@gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  7 May 2024 11:35:20 +0200
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
	Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...y.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 38/48] rcu: Allocate WQ with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM bit set

synchronize_rcu() users have to be processed regardless
of memory pressure so our private WQ needs to have at least
one execution context what WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag guarantees.

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 2a270abade4d..1d5c000e5c7a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1582,6 +1582,7 @@ static void rcu_sr_put_wait_head(struct llist_node *node)
 /* Disabled by default. */
 static int rcu_normal_wake_from_gp;
 module_param(rcu_normal_wake_from_gp, int, 0644);
+static struct workqueue_struct *sync_wq;
 
 static void rcu_sr_normal_complete(struct llist_node *node)
 {
@@ -1680,7 +1681,7 @@ static void rcu_sr_normal_gp_cleanup(void)
 	 * of outstanding users(if still left) and releasing wait-heads
 	 * added by rcu_sr_normal_gp_init() call.
 	 */
-	schedule_work(&rcu_state.srs_cleanup_work);
+	queue_work(sync_wq, &rcu_state.srs_cleanup_work);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -5585,6 +5586,9 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
 	rcu_gp_wq = alloc_workqueue("rcu_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
 	WARN_ON(!rcu_gp_wq);
 
+	sync_wq = alloc_workqueue("sync_wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+	WARN_ON(!sync_wq);
+
 	/* Fill in default value for rcutree.qovld boot parameter. */
 	/* -After- the rcu_node ->lock fields are initialized! */
 	if (qovld < 0)
-- 
2.39.2