lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:01:07 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com,
 scclevenger@...amperecomputing.com, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
 suzuki.poulose@....com, mike.leach@...aro.org,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, John Garry
 <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] coresight: Use per-sink trace ID maps for Perf
 sessions



On 03/05/2024 21:23, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 04:21:45PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>> This will allow sessions with more than CORESIGHT_TRACE_IDS_MAX ETMs
>> as long as there are fewer than that many ETMs connected to each sink.
>>
>> Each sink owns its own trace ID map, and any Perf session connecting to
>> that sink will allocate from it, even if the sink is currently in use by
>> other users. This is similar to the existing behavior where the dynamic
>> trace IDs are constant as long as there is any concurrent Perf session
>> active. It's not completely optimal because slightly more IDs will be
>> used than necessary, but the optimal solution involves tracking the PIDs
>> of each session and allocating ID maps based on the session owner. This
>> is difficult to do with the combination of per-thread and per-cpu modes
>> and some scheduling issues. The complexity of this isn't likely to worth
>> it because even with multiple users they'd just see a difference in the
>> ordering of ID allocations rather than hitting any limits (unless the
>> hardware does have too many ETMs connected to one sink).
>>
>> Per-thread mode works but only until there are any overlapping IDs, at
>> which point Perf will error out. Both per-thread mode and sysfs mode are
>> left to future changes, but both can be added on top of this initial
>> implementation and only sysfs mode requires further driver changes.
>>
>> The HW_ID version field hasn't been bumped in order to not break Perf
>> which already has an error condition for other values of that field.
>> Instead a new minor version has been added which signifies that there
>> are new fields but the old fields are backwards compatible.
> 
> I guess I can pick the tooling part now, right? Further reviewing would
> be nice tho.
> 
> - Arnaldo

Is it ok if we wait for the driver changes to be merged first? There
might some review comments which need a format change to the packets and
then a re-write of the tool changes.

You could take 1 and 2 though because they're unrelated.

Thanks
James

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ