[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4010C687-88C9-43FC-B8C9-80981B04807F@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:56:09 +0800
From: zhang warden <zhangwarden@...il.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: mbenes@...e.cz,
jikos@...nel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] *** Replace KLP_* to KLP_TRANSITION_* ***
> On May 7, 2024, at 10:41, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:21:40AM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> transition state. With this marcos renamed, comments are not
>>> necessary at this point.
>>>
>> Sorry for my careless, the comment still remains in the code. However,
>> comment in the code do no harms here. Maybe it can be kept.
>
> The comments aren't actually correct.
>
> For example, KLP_TRANSITION_UNPATCHED doesn't always mean "transitioning
> to unpatched state". Sometimes it means "transitioning *from* unpatched
> state".
>
> --
> Josh
OK, I got it. I will remove the comment later. After all, comment is not necessary at this point after we rename the macros.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists