linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / devfreq: exynos: Use Use devm_clk_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANAwSgQsqWSn4yvsgrEAyHTx2n7ccpeFqL-qUZG+3_=GgsF4rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 22:53:54 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@...nel.org>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>, 
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, 
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / devfreq: exynos: Use Use devm_clk_get_enabled()
 helpers

Hi Chanwoo

On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 21:16, Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 1:45 PM Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The devm_clk_get_enabled() helpers:
> >     - call devm_clk_get()
> >     - call clk_prepare_enable() and register what is needed in order to
> >      call clk_disable_unprepare() when needed, as a managed resource.
> >
> > This simplifies the code and avoids the calls to clk_disable_unprepare().
> >
> > While at it, use dev_err_probe consistently, and use its return value
> > to return the error code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
> > ---
> > v3 - No change
> > v2 - No change
> > ---
> >  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 21 ++++-----------------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > index 245898f1a88e..153340b6685f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
> >         platform_device_unregister(bus->icc_pdev);
> >
> >         dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
> > -       clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
> >         dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_token);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -171,7 +170,6 @@ static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
> >         platform_device_unregister(bus->icc_pdev);
> >
> >         dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
> > -       clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> > @@ -247,23 +245,15 @@ static int exynos_bus_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> >         int ret;
> >
> >         /* Get the clock to provide each bus with source clock */
> > -       bus->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "bus");
> > -       if (IS_ERR(bus->clk)) {
> > -               dev_err(dev, "failed to get bus clock\n");
> > -               return PTR_ERR(bus->clk);
> > -       }
> > -
> > -       ret = clk_prepare_enable(bus->clk);
> > -       if (ret < 0) {
> > -               dev_err(dev, "failed to get enable clock\n");
> > -               return ret;
> > -       }
> > +       bus->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "bus");
> > +       if (IS_ERR(bus->clk))
> > +               return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(bus->clk), "failed to get bus clock\n");
>
> nitpick. I recommend that better to keep 80 char on one line as following
> for the readability.
>
>                return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(bus->clk),
>                                           "failed to get bus clock\n");
>
Ok
>
I will update this in the next version.

Thanks
-Anand