lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed,  8 May 2024 20:29:50 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/10] s390/uv: update PG_arch_1 comment

We removed the usage of PG_arch_1 for page tables in commit
a51324c430db ("s390/cmma: rework no-dat handling").

Let's update the comment in UV to reflect that.

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
index 914dcec27329..ecfc08902215 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
@@ -495,13 +495,12 @@ int arch_make_page_accessible(struct page *page)
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * PG_arch_1 is used in 3 places:
-	 * 1. for kernel page tables during early boot
-	 * 2. for storage keys of huge pages and KVM
-	 * 3. As an indication that this small folio might be secure. This can
+	 * PG_arch_1 is used in 2 places:
+	 * 1. for storage keys of hugetlb folios and KVM
+	 * 2. As an indication that this small folio might be secure. This can
 	 *    overindicate, e.g. we set the bit before calling
 	 *    convert_to_secure.
-	 * As secure pages are never huge, all 3 variants can co-exists.
+	 * As secure pages are never large folios, both variants can co-exists.
 	 */
 	if (!test_bit(PG_arch_1, &folio->flags))
 		return 0;
-- 
2.45.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ