[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWMbLDmT8=h_He7+9V+ntTdg1+5hmSTm87VJsTy2m3Bag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 14:04:58 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, leo.yan@...ux.dev,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:15 AM James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
>
> check_allowed_ops() is used from both HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> and HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT sections, so move it into the right place so
> that it's available when either are defined. This shows up when doing
> a static cross compile for arm64:
>
> $ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS="-static" \
> EXTRA_PERFLIBS="-lexpat"
>
> util/dwarf-aux.c:1723:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'check_allowed_ops'
>
> Fixes: 55442cc2f22d ("perf dwarf-aux: Check allowed DWARF Ops")
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
(eye-balled to see the #if problem exists and this is the correct fix)
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> index c0a492e65388..c9584563cd56 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> @@ -1215,6 +1215,34 @@ static int offset_from_dwarf_op(Dwarf_Op *op)
> }
> return -1;
> }
> +
> +static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> +{
> + /* The first op is checked separately */
> + ops++;
> + nops--;
> +
> + /*
> + * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> + * register and offset exactly. Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> + * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> + * location.
> + */
> + while (nops) {
> + switch (ops->atom) {
> + case DW_OP_stack_value:
> + case DW_OP_deref_size:
> + case DW_OP_deref:
> + case DW_OP_piece:
> + break;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> + ops++;
> + nops--;
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> #endif /* HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT || HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT */
>
> #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT
> @@ -1395,34 +1423,6 @@ static bool match_var_offset(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, struct find_var_data *data,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops)
> -{
> - /* The first op is checked separately */
> - ops++;
> - nops--;
> -
> - /*
> - * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given
> - * register and offset exactly. Thus it rejects any complex expressions
> - * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the
> - * location.
> - */
> - while (nops) {
> - switch (ops->atom) {
> - case DW_OP_stack_value:
> - case DW_OP_deref_size:
> - case DW_OP_deref:
> - case DW_OP_piece:
> - break;
> - default:
> - return false;
> - }
> - ops++;
> - nops--;
> - }
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> /* Only checks direct child DIEs in the given scope. */
> static int __die_find_var_reg_cb(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, void *arg)
> {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists