[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zjv8xBXcRnfShpvf@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 23:29:24 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: clkdev: report over-sized strings when creating clkdev entries
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 04:07:57PM -0500, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> The patch [1] ("clk: samsung: Don't register clkdev lookup for the
> fixed rate clocks") fixes those. I think both have to be applied ASAP.
> In case of E850-96, I guess [1] is more critical.
The fixes to clkdev.c have been pushed out for a while now, so I think
you may need to update your tree. There's been one more fix to it more
recently (because of the whole va_copy() debacle).
Whether linux-next picks up the latest version depends when they pull
in relation to me pushing the changes out, which can take 48 hours
due to the timezone differences. linux-next tends not to pick stuff
up quickly if one's in the UK and pushes stuff out in the late
afternoon/evening. That said, the NULL fix has been pushed out for
a few days now.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists