| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240508231904.2259-1-hdanton@sina.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 07:19:04 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+4c493dcd5a68168a94b2@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_seq_start
On Tue, 07 May 2024 22:36:18 -0700
> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: dccb07f2914c Merge tag 'for-6.9-rc7-tag' of git://git.kern..
> git tree: upstream
> console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=137daa6c980000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9d7ea7de0cb32587
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4c493dcd5a68168a94b2
> compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1134f3c0980000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1367a504980000
>
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ea1961ce01fe/disk-dccb07f2.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/445a00347402/vmlinux-dccb07f2.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/461aed7c4df3/bzImage-dccb07f2.xz
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+4c493dcd5a68168a94b2@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-00012-gdccb07f2914c #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor149/5078 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff88802a978888 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x53/0x3b0 fs/kernfs/file.c:154
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88802d80b540 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter+0xb7/0xd60 fs/seq_file.c:182
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #4 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
> seq_read_iter+0xb7/0xd60 fs/seq_file.c:182
> call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2104 [inline]
> copy_splice_read+0x662/0xb60 fs/splice.c:365
> do_splice_read fs/splice.c:985 [inline]
> splice_file_to_pipe+0x299/0x500 fs/splice.c:1295
> do_sendfile+0x515/0xdc0 fs/read_write.c:1301
> __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1362 [inline]
> __se_sys_sendfile64+0x17c/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1348
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> -> #3 (&pipe->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
> iter_file_splice_write+0x335/0x14e0 fs/splice.c:687
> backing_file_splice_write+0x2bc/0x4c0 fs/backing-file.c:289
> ovl_splice_write+0x3cf/0x500 fs/overlayfs/file.c:379
> do_splice_from fs/splice.c:941 [inline]
> do_splice+0xd77/0x1880 fs/splice.c:1354
> __do_splice fs/splice.c:1436 [inline]
> __do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1652 [inline]
> __se_sys_splice+0x331/0x4a0 fs/splice.c:1634
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> -> #2 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
> lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
> percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
> __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1664 [inline]
> sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1800
> mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:409
> ovl_create_object+0x13b/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:629
> lookup_open fs/namei.c:3497 [inline]
> open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3566 [inline]
> path_openat+0x1425/0x3240 fs/namei.c:3796
> do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3826
> do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1406
> do_sys_open fs/open.c:1421 [inline]
> __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1429 [inline]
> __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1425 [inline]
> __x64_sys_open+0x225/0x270 fs/open.c:1425
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> -> #1 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}:
> lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
> down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
> inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:805 [inline]
> lookup_slow+0x45/0x70 fs/namei.c:1708
> walk_component+0x2e1/0x410 fs/namei.c:2004
> lookup_last fs/namei.c:2461 [inline]
> path_lookupat+0x16f/0x450 fs/namei.c:2485
> filename_lookup+0x256/0x610 fs/namei.c:2514
> kern_path+0x35/0x50 fs/namei.c:2622
> lookup_bdev+0xc5/0x290 block/bdev.c:1136
> resume_store+0x1a0/0x710 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1235
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3a1/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
> call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2110 [inline]
> new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
> vfs_write+0xa84/0xcb0 fs/read_write.c:590
> ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> -> #0 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
> validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
> __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
> lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
> kernfs_seq_start+0x53/0x3b0 fs/kernfs/file.c:154
> traverse+0x14f/0x550 fs/seq_file.c:106
> seq_read_iter+0xc5e/0xd60 fs/seq_file.c:195
> call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2104 [inline]
> copy_splice_read+0x662/0xb60 fs/splice.c:365
> do_splice_read fs/splice.c:985 [inline]
> splice_file_to_pipe+0x299/0x500 fs/splice.c:1295
> do_sendfile+0x515/0xdc0 fs/read_write.c:1301
> __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1362 [inline]
> __se_sys_sendfile64+0x17c/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1348
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
> &of->mutex --> &pipe->mutex --> &p->lock
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&p->lock);
> lock(&pipe->mutex);
> lock(&p->lock);
> lock(&of->mutex);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
This shows 16b52bbee482 ("kernfs: annotate different lockdep class for
of->mutex of writable files") is a bandaid.
>
> 2 locks held by syz-executor149/5078:
> #0: ffff88807de89868 (&pipe->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: splice_file_to_pipe+0x2e/0x500 fs/splice.c:1292
> #1: ffff88802d80b540 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter+0xb7/0xd60 fs/seq_file.c:182
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 5078 Comm: syz-executor149 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-00012-gdccb07f2914c #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
> check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
> validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
> __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
> lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
> kernfs_seq_start+0x53/0x3b0 fs/kernfs/file.c:154
> traverse+0x14f/0x550 fs/seq_file.c:106
> seq_read_iter+0xc5e/0xd60 fs/seq_file.c:195
> call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2104 [inline]
> copy_splice_read+0x662/0xb60 fs/splice.c:365
> do_splice_read fs/splice.c:985 [inline]
> splice_file_to_pipe+0x299/0x500 fs/splice.c:1295
> do_sendfile+0x515/0xdc0 fs/read_write.c:1301
> __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1362 [inline]
> __se_sys_sendfile64+0x17c/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1348
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> RIP: 0033:0x7f7d8d33f8e9
> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 51 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007f7d8d2b8218 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7d8d3c9428 RCX: 00007f7d8d33f8e9
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000007 RDI: 0000000000000006
> RBP: 00007f7d8d3c9420 R08: 00007ffdc82d7c57 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f7d8d39606c
> R13: 0030656c69662f2e R14: 0079616c7265766f R15: 00007f7d8d39603b
> </TASK>
>
>
> ---
> If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
> #syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
> If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists