[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240508000454.GM4718@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 21:04:54 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] iommu: Add attachment handle to struct iopf_group
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:57:04PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> @@ -206,8 +197,11 @@ void iommu_report_device_fault(struct device *dev, struct iopf_fault *evt)
> if (group == &abort_group)
> goto err_abort;
>
> - group->domain = get_domain_for_iopf(dev, fault);
> - if (!group->domain)
> + if (!(fault->prm.flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID) ||
> + get_attach_handle_for_iopf(dev, fault->prm.pasid, group))
> + get_attach_handle_for_iopf(dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID, group);
That seems a bit weird looking?
get_attach_handle_for_iopf(dev,
(fault->prm.flags &
IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID) ? fault->prm.pasid : IOMMU_NO_PASID,
group);
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists