lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58f13e47-4765-fce4-daf4-dffcc5ae2330@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 17:42:47 +0800
From: Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: lee bruce <xrivendell7@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 yue sun <samsun1006219@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 syzkaller@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: WARNING in fuse_request_end



On 5/8/2024 4:21 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 15:30, Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
>> index 3ec8bb5e68ff5..840cefdf24e26 100644
>> --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
>> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
>> @@ -1814,6 +1814,7 @@ static void fuse_resend(struct fuse_conn *fc)
>>
>>         list_for_each_entry_safe(req, next, &to_queue, list) {
>>                 __set_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags);
>> +               clear_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags);
>>                 /* mark the request as resend request */
>>                 req->in.h.unique |= FUSE_UNIQUE_RESEND;
>>         }
>>
> ACK, fix looks good.
>
> Would you mind resending it as a proper patch?

Thanks for the ACK. Will post it.
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
>
> .


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ