[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB5751A0943E23FE46AC4B7D89B8E52@DM8PR11MB5751.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 11:20:22 +0000
From: "Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>
To: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>, "paul.walmsley@...ive.com"
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, "palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "luke.r.nels@...il.com"
<luke.r.nels@...il.com>, "xi.wang@...il.com" <xi.wang@...il.com>,
"bjorn@...nel.org" <bjorn@...nel.org>
CC: "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>, "daniel@...earbox.net"
<daniel@...earbox.net>, "andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
"martin.lau@...ux.dev" <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, "eddyz87@...il.com"
<eddyz87@...il.com>, "song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>,
"yonghong.song@...ux.dev" <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>, "kpsingh@...nel.org"
<kpsingh@...nel.org>, "sdf@...gle.com" <sdf@...gle.com>, "haoluo@...gle.com"
<haoluo@...gle.com>, "jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "Li, Haicheng"
<haicheng.li@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] riscv, bpf: Optimize zextw insn with Zba extension
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 8:47 PM
> To: Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>; paul.walmsley@...ive.com;
> palmer@...belt.com; aou@...s.berkeley.edu; luke.r.nels@...il.com;
> xi.wang@...il.com; bjorn@...nel.org
> Cc: ast@...nel.org; daniel@...earbox.net; andrii@...nel.org;
> martin.lau@...ux.dev; eddyz87@...il.com; song@...nel.org;
> yonghong.song@...ux.dev; john.fastabend@...il.com; kpsingh@...nel.org;
> sdf@...gle.com; haoluo@...gle.com; jolsa@...nel.org; linux-
> riscv@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; bpf@...r.kernel.org;
> Li, Haicheng <haicheng.li@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv, bpf: Optimize zextw insn with Zba extension
>
>
> On 2024/5/7 18:45, Xiao Wang wrote:
> > The Zba extension provides add.uw insn which can be used to implement
> > zext.w with rs2 set as ZERO.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index 6bec1bce6586..0679127cc0ea 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -586,6 +586,14 @@ config RISCV_ISA_V_PREEMPTIVE
> > preemption. Enabling this config will result in higher memory
> > consumption due to the allocation of per-task's kernel Vector
> context.
> >
> > +config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBA
> > + bool
> > + default y
> > + depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zba)
> > + depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zba)
> > + depends on LLD_VERSION >= 150000 || LD_VERSION >= 23900
> > + depends on AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH
> > +
> > config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB
> > bool
> > default y
> > @@ -601,6 +609,17 @@ config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_VECTOR_CRYPTO
> > def_bool $(as-instr, .option arch$(comma) +v$(comma) +zvkb)
> > depends on AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH
> >
> > +config RISCV_ISA_ZBA
> > + bool "Zba extension support for bit manipulation instructions"
> > + depends on TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBA
> > + depends on RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
> > + default y
> > + help
> > + Adds support to dynamically detect the presence of the ZBA
> > + extension (address generation acceleration) and enable its usage.
>
> It would be better to add Zba's function description like Zbb.
OK, would add some description on next version.
Thanks,
Xiao
>
> > +
> > + If you don't know what to do here, say Y.
> > +
> > config RISCV_ISA_ZBB
> > bool "Zbb extension support for bit manipulation instructions"
> > depends on TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> > index f4b6b3b9edda..18a7885ba95e 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> > @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ static inline bool rvc_enabled(void)
> > return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool rvzba_enabled(void)
> > +{
> > + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBA) &&
> riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA);
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline bool rvzbb_enabled(void)
> > {
> > return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) &&
> riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB);
> > @@ -937,6 +942,14 @@ static inline u16 rvc_sdsp(u32 imm9, u8 rs2)
> > return rv_css_insn(0x7, imm, rs2, 0x2);
> > }
> >
> > +/* RV64-only ZBA instructions. */
> > +
> > +static inline u32 rvzba_zextw(u8 rd, u8 rs1)
> > +{
> > + /* add.uw rd, rs1, ZERO */
> > + return rv_r_insn(0x04, RV_REG_ZERO, rs1, 0, rd, 0x3b);
> > +}
> > +
> > #endif /* __riscv_xlen == 64 */
> >
> > /* Helper functions that emit RVC instructions when possible. */
> > @@ -1159,6 +1172,11 @@ static inline void emit_zexth(u8 rd, u8 rs, struct
> rv_jit_context *ctx)
> >
> > static inline void emit_zextw(u8 rd, u8 rs, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
> > {
> > + if (rvzba_enabled()) {
> > + emit(rvzba_zextw(rd, rs), ctx);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> Looks good to me. It seems that Zba has fewer uses in rv64 bpf jit.
>
> > +
> > emit_slli(rd, rs, 32, ctx);
> > emit_srli(rd, rd, 32, ctx);
> > }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists