[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240508080757.5022b867@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 08:07:57 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes
On Wed, 08 May 2024 15:00:28 +0100 David Howells wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Looks like these got marked as Rejected in patchwork.
> > I think either because lore is confused and attaches an exchange with
> > DaveM from 2022 to them (?) or because I mentioned to DaveM that I'm
> > not sure these are fixes. So let me ask - on a scale of 1 to 10, how
> > convinced are you that these should go to Linus this week rather than
> > being categorized as general improvements and go during the merge
> > window (without the Fixes tags)?
>
> Ah, sorry. I marked them rejected as I put myself as cc: not S-o-b on one of
> them, but then got distracted and didn't get around to reposting them. And
> Jeff mentioned that the use of the MORE-PACKETS flag is not exactly
> consistent between various implementations.
Ah, mystery solved :)
> So if you could take just the first two for the moment?
Done!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists