[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29e7b97b-7a61-9b64-2c57-5a5d0e5f190e@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 17:17:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...hat.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: arm64: add emulation for CTR_EL0 register
Hej Oliver,
On Wed, 1 May 2024, Oliver Upton wrote:
>> +static u64 reset_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
>> +{
>> + vcpu->kvm->arch.ctr_el0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0);
>> + return vcpu->kvm->arch.ctr_el0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> We definitely do not want this value to change across a vCPU reset, it
> should be handled like the other ID registers where they only get reset
> once for the VM lifetime.
Hm, maybe I'm misreading the code here but I don't think this is true
for existing regs e.g. CLIDR_EL1 or the stuff defined via ID_WRITABLE().
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists