linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] mlx5: Add netdev-genl queue stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zj1W_JH-k3skeHPj@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 16:06:36 -0700
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	saeedm@...dia.com, gal@...dia.com, nalramli@...tly.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
	"open list:MELLANOX MLX5 core VPI driver" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] mlx5: Add netdev-genl queue stats

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:42:11PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> ..
> 
> > > The off-channels queues (like PTP) do not exist in default. So they are out
> > > of the game unless you explicitly enables them.
> > 
> > I did not enable them, but if you saw the thread, it sounds like Jakub's
> > preference is that in the v2 I include the PTP stats in get_base_stats.
> > 
> > Are you OK with that?
> 
> Sounds good.
> 
> > Are there other queue stats I should include as well?
> > 
> 
> The QOS/HTB queues.
> See mlx5e_stats_grp_sw_update_stats_qos.

Sure, thanks, I can take a look. I think maybe an issue might be that if
I include QOS/HTB queues then tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py
will start to fail.

I could be mistaken, but it seems that QOS/HTB are not included in the rtnl
stats, is that right?

If the goal is for queue stats to match rtnl then maybe I should leave
QOS/HTB out and they can be added to both RTNL and queue stats together at
a later time.