[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81a50925-0c38-435c-b423-6c4c97486b2a@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 00:43:14 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>,
Michael Tretter <m.tretter@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/18] media: venus: Refactor struct
hfi_session_get_property_pkt
On 07/05/2024 17:27, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> - u32 num_properties;
> - u32 data[1];
> + u32 one;
> + u32 data;
The conversion of `data[1]` to plain `data` is fine but, the conversion
of `num_properties` to `one` doesn't fit the naming convention of this
code which uses `num_something` extensively.
Please retain the name `num_properties` for that reason.
Then add.
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists