[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240509052447.kwdlruqad7r5h4pi@treble>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 22:24:47 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Maksim Davydov <davydov-max@...dex-team.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] x86/bugs: Add 'spectre_bhi=vmexit' cmdline option
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 06:10:21PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > @@ -1659,19 +1662,22 @@ static void __init bhi_select_mitigation(void)
> > return;
> > }
> > + /* Mitigate in hardware if supported */
> > if (spec_ctrl_bhi_dis())
> > return;
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64))
> > return;
> > - /* Mitigate KVM by default */
> > - setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP_ON_VMEXIT);
> > - pr_info("Spectre BHI mitigation: SW BHB clearing on vm exit\n");
> > + if (bhi_mitigation == BHI_MITIGATION_VMEXIT_ONLY) {
> > + pr_info("Spectre BHI mitigation: SW BHB clearing on vm exit only\n");
> > + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP_ON_VMEXIT);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> nit: How about setting CLEAR_BHB_LOOP_ON_VMEXIT unconditionally, then
> afterwards checking if MITIGATION_VMEXIT_ONLY is set and if yes simply
> return, that way you don't duplicate the setup of the VMEXIT code
I think the duplication actually makes it more readable. In both cases
it puts the setting of the features together along with the
corresponding pr_info().
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists