linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/13] dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: rework binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21160163-4380-4d24-b25f-9caa9993bd7d@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 08:57:47 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>,
 Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: rework binding

On 09/05/2024 00:09, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Johan Hovold (2024-05-07 08:23:04)
>> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 08:43:08AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> -
>>>>      maxItems: 1
>>>>
>>>>    interrupts:
>>>>      maxItems: 1
>>>>
>>>> -    description: Parent interrupt.
>>>> -
>>>>    reset-gpios:
>>>>      maxItems: 1
>>>>
>>>> -  "#interrupt-cells":
>>>> +  vdd_l1_l2-supply: true
>>>
>>> No underscores in property names.
>>
>> Indeed. These names come from Qualcomm's v15, but I should have caught
>> that. Thanks.
> 
> Drive by comment: we have underscores to match the label on the
> datasheet. Not sure that will sway your opinion. Only trying to provide
> some background rationale.

I know, but if datasheet calls this "yellow_pony_!!!#1l33t-supply" we
still won't use datasheet names directly, so s/_/-/. That's also W=2
warning.

Best regards,
Krzysztof