linux-kernel - [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: fix register configuration for tdm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240509-8192-tdm-v1-1-530b54645763@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 07:31:29 +0000
From: Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@...omium.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
 Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, 
 Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: fix register configuration for tdm

For DSP_A, data is a BCK cycle behind LRCK trigger edge. For DSP_B, this
delay doesn't exist. Fix the delay configuration to match the standard.

Fixes: 52fcd65414abfc ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: support tdm in platform driver")
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@...omium.org>
---
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c
index 9ce06821c7d0f..49440db370af0 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c
@@ -566,10 +566,10 @@ static int mtk_dai_tdm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
 		tdm_con |= 1 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
 		tdm_con |= get_tdm_lrck_width(format) << LRCK_TDM_WIDTH_SFT;
 	} else if (tdm_priv->tdm_out_mode == TDM_OUT_DSP_A) {
-		tdm_con |= 0 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
+		tdm_con |= 1 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
 		tdm_con |= 0 << LRCK_TDM_WIDTH_SFT;
 	} else if (tdm_priv->tdm_out_mode == TDM_OUT_DSP_B) {
-		tdm_con |= 1 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
+		tdm_con |= 0 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
 		tdm_con |= 0 << LRCK_TDM_WIDTH_SFT;
 	}
 

---
base-commit: 45db3ab70092637967967bfd8e6144017638563c
change-id: 20240509-8192-tdm-cbf2a73c9dd3

Best regards,
-- 
Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@...omium.org>