linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: enable hdmi bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 10:31:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
 Venkata Prahlad Valluru <quic_vvalluru@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_nankam@...cinc.com, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: enable hdmi bridge

On 08/05/2024 10:13, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 10:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/05/2024 21:20, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/7/2024 9:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 07/05/2024 18:30, Venkata Prahlad Valluru wrote:
>>>>> Rb3Gen2 has a lt9611uxc DSI-to-HDMI bridge on i2c0, with
>>>>> reset gpio from pm7250b gpio2 and irq gpio from tlmm gpio24.
>>>>> Bridge supplies are Vdd connected to input supply directly
>>>>> and vcc to L11c. Enable HDMI output, bridge and corresponding
>>>>> DSI output.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prahlad Valluru <quic_vvalluru@...cinc.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v3: - Updated commit text
>>>>>      - Arranged nodes in alphabetical order
>>>>>      - Fixed signoff
>>>>>      - Fixed drive strength for lt9611_irq_pin
>>>>>      - Removed 'label' from hdmi-connector, which is optional
>>>>
>>>> Please respond to each Bjorn comment and explain how did you implement it...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, agreed. Even though it seems like you mostly just agreed to mine
>>> and Bjorn's suggestions and decided to implement all those in v3 , it
>>> would have been better to explicitly ack them or tell why you agreed or
>>> what went wrong that you had not done it in v2 itself to close the loop.
>>
>> The problem is that one or more were ignored... By responding to each of
>> them, I hope they will be finally read and understood instead of
>> repeating the same mistake three times.
> 
> I found a mistake that was repeated two times. This leaves me
> wondering which mistake was repeated three times.

That was about future, I was expecting v4 as in-reply-to :)

Best regards,
Krzysztof