linux-kernel - Re: [v3] time/tick-sched: idle load balancing when nohz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18e3ebff-8993-410a-867f-0c84b9b4aed4@web.de>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 11:40:11 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Yun Levi <ppbuk5246@...il.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
 Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3] time/tick-sched: idle load balancing when nohz_full cpu
 becomes idle.

>> * How do you think about stress condition ordering concerns around
>>   the system configuration “nohz_full”?
>
> Well.. regardless of the stress condition, it wants to fix the
> inconsistent behavior
> happening when enter "idle state"

Were any special test cases or related analysis tools involved
in the discovery of improvable software behaviour?

Regards,
Markus