[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zjy_jp2f-aY5mAR6@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 14:20:30 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>,
Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] regulator: add pm8008 pmic regulator driver
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 03:07:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Wed, May 08, 2024 at 10:37:50PM +0000, Stephen Boyd kirjoitti:
> > Quoting Johan Hovold (2024-05-06 08:08:29)
>
> ...
>
> > > + BUILD_BUG_ON((ARRAY_SIZE(pldo_ranges) != 1) ||
> >
> > This should be an && not || right?
>
> > > + (ARRAY_SIZE(nldo_ranges) != 1));
>
> In any case BUILD_BUG_ON() is not encouraged for such cases, it would be much
> better to have a static_assert() near to one of those arrays.
I think the reason it is placed here is that the above line reads:
rdesc->n_linear_ranges = 1;
and that would need to change if anyone expands the arrays.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists