lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 15:15:05 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Return label, if set, for IRQ only line

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> If line has been locked as IRQ without requesting,
> still check its label and return it, if not NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index db536ec9734d..1f1673552767 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -105,16 +105,16 @@ const char *gpiod_get_label(struct gpio_desc *desc)
>         unsigned long flags;
>
>         flags = READ_ONCE(desc->flags);
> -       if (test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &flags) &&
> -           !test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &flags))
> -               return "interrupt";
> -
> -       if (!test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &flags))
> -               return NULL;
>
>         label = srcu_dereference_check(desc->label, &desc->srcu,
>                                        srcu_read_lock_held(&desc->srcu));
>
> +       if (test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &flags))
> +               return label->str ?: "interrupt";
> +
> +       if (!test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &flags))
> +               return NULL;
> +
>         return label->str;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac
>

What good would it be if gpiochip_dup_line_label() returns NULL for
unrequested lines anyway?

Bart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ