linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/13] regulator: add pm8008 pmic regulator driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZjzOmgdM_lkOPlXK@surfacebook.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 16:24:42 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>,
	Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] regulator: add pm8008 pmic regulator driver

Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:53:02AM +0200, Johan Hovold kirjoitti:
> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 08:22:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:44 PM Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:09:50PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Mon, May 06, 2024 at 05:08:29PM +0200, Johan Hovold kirjoitti:

..

> > > >                       return dev_err_probe(...);
> > >
> > > Nah, regmap won't trigger a probe deferral.
> > 
> > And it doesn't matter. What we gain with dev_err_probe() is:
> > - special handling of deferred probe
> > - unified format of messages in ->probe() stage
> > 
> > The second one is encouraged.
> 
> I don't care about your personal preferences.

Did I say it's mine personal preference.
Or should I put it as preference of several (majority?) maintainers?

Whatever, it's up to Lee.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko