linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Minor fixups for hugetlb fault path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZjzO4xH97Lu2UgEu@x1n>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 09:25:55 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
	Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Minor fixups for hugetlb fault path

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this series contains a couple of fixups for hugetlb_fault and hugetlb_wp
> respectively, where a VM_FAULT_SET_HINDEX call was missing.
> 
> I did not bother with a Fixes tag because the missing piece here is that
> we will not report to userspace the right extension of the faulty area
> by adjusting struct kernel_siginfo.si_addr_lsb, but I do not consider that
> to be a big issue because I assume that userspace already knows the size
> of the mapping anyway.

Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>

-- 
Peter Xu